Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [18F] fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Until now, no kinetic model was described for the oncologic tracer [18F]fluoromethylcholine ([18F] FCho), so it was aimed to validate a proper model, which is easy to implement and allows tracer quantification in tissues. Methods: Based on the metabolic profile, two types of compartmental models were evaluated. One is a 3C2i model, which contains three tissue compartments and two input functions and corrects for possible [18F] fluorobetaine ([18F]FBet) uptake by the tissues. On the other hand, a two-tissue-compartment model (2C1i) was evaluated. Moreover, a comparison, based on intra-observer variability, was made between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis. Results: Determination of the [18F]FCho-to-[18F]FBet uptake ratios in tissues and evaluation of the fitting of both kinetic models indicated that corrections for [18F]FBet uptake are not mandatory. In addition, [18F]FCho uptake is well described by the 2C1i model and by graphical analysis by means of the Patlak plot. Conclusions: The Patlak plot is a reliable, precise, and robust method to quantify [18F]FCho uptake independent of scan time or plasma clearance. In addition, it is easily implemented, even under non-equilibrium conditions and without creating additional errors. © 2013 Slaets and De Vos; licensee Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slaets, D., & de Vos, F. (2013). Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [18F] fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice. EJNMMI Research, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free