Abstract
Background: Until now, no kinetic model was described for the oncologic tracer [18F]fluoromethylcholine ([18F] FCho), so it was aimed to validate a proper model, which is easy to implement and allows tracer quantification in tissues. Methods: Based on the metabolic profile, two types of compartmental models were evaluated. One is a 3C2i model, which contains three tissue compartments and two input functions and corrects for possible [18F] fluorobetaine ([18F]FBet) uptake by the tissues. On the other hand, a two-tissue-compartment model (2C1i) was evaluated. Moreover, a comparison, based on intra-observer variability, was made between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis. Results: Determination of the [18F]FCho-to-[18F]FBet uptake ratios in tissues and evaluation of the fitting of both kinetic models indicated that corrections for [18F]FBet uptake are not mandatory. In addition, [18F]FCho uptake is well described by the 2C1i model and by graphical analysis by means of the Patlak plot. Conclusions: The Patlak plot is a reliable, precise, and robust method to quantify [18F]FCho uptake independent of scan time or plasma clearance. In addition, it is easily implemented, even under non-equilibrium conditions and without creating additional errors. © 2013 Slaets and De Vos; licensee Springer.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Slaets, D., & de Vos, F. (2013). Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [18F] fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice. EJNMMI Research, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-66
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.