Comparison of Airway Responsiveness to Exercise and Histamine Inhalation in Asthmatics

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to investigate the differences between EIA positive and negative subjects, pulmonary function data at rest, atopic tendency and bronchial sensitivity and reactivity were compared. Pulmonary function data revealed no significant difference between two groups except closing volume which was higher in EIA positive patients (p< 0.01) and also Rrs which was higher in EIA positive patients only in female (p< 0.05). Incidence of positive skin tests and higher levels of IgE were more frequent in EIA positive, however, IgE was not significantly different. Relationship between % fall of FEVj after exercise and bronchial sensitivity was examined, however, no correlation was found in two parameters. Bronchial reactivity was not different in two groups. This suggests that EIA positive patients cannot be distinguished from EIA negative by pulmonary function data at rest or by atopic tendency, and also that different mechanisms play a role to produce airway constriction following exercise and inhalation challenge. © 1983, The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horie, T., Enomoto, S., Inazawa, T., Okuma, A., Hosokawa, Y., & Okayasu, M. (1983). Comparison of Airway Responsiveness to Exercise and Histamine Inhalation in Asthmatics. Japanese Journal of Medicine, 22(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine1962.22.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free