Pathological subtrochanteric fractures in 194 patients: A comparison of outcome after surgical treatment of pathological and non-pathological fractures

32Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background The surgical treatment of pathological subtrochanteric fractures has been associated with technical difficulties and frequent failures. We analyzed survival, risk factors for death, and outcome after surgical treatment. Methods The study group consisted of 194 patients with pathological subtrochanteric femur fractures operated during 1999-2009. Cox multiple-regression analysis was performed to study risk factors and results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR). We included a control group with non-pathological subtrochanteric fractures (n = 87) for comparison. Results The median age at surgery was 68 (29-96) years in the study group and 82 (66-101) in the controls. The 1-year survival rate after surgery was 33% (95% CI: 26-40) in the study group and 85% (79-93) in the controls. In the study group, the risk of death after surgery was increased for patients ≥65 years of age (HR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), with a moderate (HR 2.2, 1.5-3.4) and poor (HR 2.9, 1.6-5.2) Karnofsky score, with visceral metastases (HR 1.6, 1.1-2.3), and perioperative hemoglobin levels <100 g/L (HR 2.2, 1.3-3.7). In patients with pathological fractures, there was no statistically significant difference concerning reoperation rates comparing intramedullary nails (9%) with endoprostheses (6%; P = 0.3). Conclusions Surgery for pathological subtrochanteric femur fractures is a relatively safe and effective procedure. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiss, R. J., Ekström, W., Hansen, B. H., Keller, J., Laitinen, M., Trovik, C., … Wedin, R. (2013). Pathological subtrochanteric fractures in 194 patients: A comparison of outcome after surgical treatment of pathological and non-pathological fractures. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 107(5), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23277

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free