The incidence, clinical features, microbiology, and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis associated with glaucoma surgery in children

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To study the incidence, clinical features, microbiology, and visual outcome of endophthalmitis associated with glaucoma surgery in children at a tertiary care eye hospital in Saudi Arabia. Methods: The medical records of patients <18 years of age who presented with endophthalmitis following glaucoma surgery between January 2008 and October 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Endophthalmitis after glaucoma surgery was observed in 20 eyes, or 18 out of 853 eyes that underwent glaucoma surgery at our institution (2.1%; 3.3% for glaucoma drainage device [GDD] surgery and 0.9% for glaucoma filtration surgery [GFS]). The mean patient age at time of endophthalmitis was 5.2 ± 4 years (range, 1-15 years). Delayed endophthalmitis (developing at least 6 weeks after surgery) occurred in 13 of the 20 eyes (65%). The median interval between glaucoma surgery and the development of endophthalmitis was shorter after GDD surgery (59 days; range, 26-1325) compared with GFS (606 days; range, 20-2190). Visual outcome was generally poor, with counting fingers or worse in 14 of 20 eyes (70%). A causative organism was identified in 16 of 20 eyes (80%) either through a vitreous tap or vitrectomy specimen, and the most cultured organism was Streptococcus pneumoniae (45%). Conclusions: In our study cohort, the incidence of endophthalmitis after GFS was 0.9% and 3.3% after GDD implant surgery; the incidence was higher than previously reported in adults, with poor long-term visual prognosis in the pediatric age group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Zahrani, A. T., AlZendi, N. A., Alsulaiman, S. M., AlShahwan, S., Khan, M. A., & Malik, R. (2025). The incidence, clinical features, microbiology, and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis associated with glaucoma surgery in children. Journal of AAPOS, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2025.104114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free