Abstract
▪ Distal biceps tendon (DBT) conditions comprise a spectrum of disorders including bicipitoradial bursitis, partial tears, acute and chronic complete tears. ▪ In low-demand patients with complete DBT tears, nonoperative treatment may be entertained provided the patient understands the potential for residual weakness, particularly in forearm supination. ▪ Most acute tears are best treated by primary repair using either single-incision or double-incision techniques with good clinical outcomes. ▪ Single-incision techniques may carry a higher risk of nerverelated complications, whereas double-incision techniques have historically been considered to carry a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, particularly if the ulna is exposed. ▪ Various fixation techniques, including bone tunnels, cortical buttons, suture anchors, interference screws or a combination seem to provide different fixation strength but similar clinical outcomes. ▪ Some chronic tears may be repaired primarily, provided tendon tissue can be identified; alternatively, autograft or allograft reconstruction can be considered, and good outcomes have been reported with both techniques.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Alentorn-Geli, E., Assenmacher, A. T., & Sánchez-Sotelo, J. (2016). Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(9), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.