Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review

44Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

▪ Distal biceps tendon (DBT) conditions comprise a spectrum of disorders including bicipitoradial bursitis, partial tears, acute and chronic complete tears. ▪ In low-demand patients with complete DBT tears, nonoperative treatment may be entertained provided the patient understands the potential for residual weakness, particularly in forearm supination. ▪ Most acute tears are best treated by primary repair using either single-incision or double-incision techniques with good clinical outcomes. ▪ Single-incision techniques may carry a higher risk of nerverelated complications, whereas double-incision techniques have historically been considered to carry a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, particularly if the ulna is exposed. ▪ Various fixation techniques, including bone tunnels, cortical buttons, suture anchors, interference screws or a combination seem to provide different fixation strength but similar clinical outcomes. ▪ Some chronic tears may be repaired primarily, provided tendon tissue can be identified; alternatively, autograft or allograft reconstruction can be considered, and good outcomes have been reported with both techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alentorn-Geli, E., Assenmacher, A. T., & Sánchez-Sotelo, J. (2016). Distal biceps tendon injuries: A clinically relevant current concepts review. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(9), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free