We respond to several important and valid concerns about our study ("The Prevalence of Folk Dualism in Early China,"Cognitive Science 35: 997-1007) by Klein and Klein, defending our interpretation of our data. We also argue that, despite the undeniable challenges involved in qualitatively coding texts from ancient cultures, the standard tools used throughout the cognitive sciences-large quantities of data, coders as blind to the hypothesis as possible, intercoder reliability measures, and statistical analysis-allow the noise of randomly distributed interpretative differences to be distinguished from the signal of genuine historical patterns. © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Slingerland, E., & Chudek, M. (2012). The Challenges of Qualitatively Coding Ancient Texts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01232.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.