Check the checks: A comparison of fact-checking practices between newspapers and independent organizations during 2020 U.S. election presidential debates

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

By conducting content analyses of 440 fact checks (N = 440), the study examined the fact-checking practices of three leading national newspapers (i.e., The New York Times, The Washington Post, and USA Today) and three independent fact-checking organizations (i.e., FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and Snopes.com) in the United States during the 2020 presidential debates and town halls. The results found differences in fact-checking within three independent organizations, in terms of candidates, ratings, and used sources. Meanwhile, the three news outlets had differences in fact-checked candidates but consistency in sources and ratings. H1 was supported suggesting that three news organizations fact-checked Trump’s statements more than Biden’s, and as incorrect, compared with three independent organizations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diep, P. P. U. (2025). Check the checks: A comparison of fact-checking practices between newspapers and independent organizations during 2020 U.S. election presidential debates. Newspaper Research Journal, 46(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329241298965

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free