Evaluating the continuously reinforced concrete pavement performance models of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The reasonableness of the models in the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) used to predict the performance of the continuously reinforced concrete pavements (CRCPs) was evaluated in this study. The MEPDG punchout, crack width and spacing and load transfer efficiency (LTE) models were evaluated through a factorial sensitivity study. The input matrix was defined to reflect 'real-world' design situations. It was found that, contrary to the 1993 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Design Guide, crack width mustbebelow 0.5mm tomaintain adequate performance. Additionally, based on the performance predictions from the MEPDG, a crack spacing of less than 1.8 m ensures a crack width of less than 0.5 mm, which is another contradiction with the approach in the 1993 Guide. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vandenbossche, J. M., Nassiri, S., Ramirez, L. C., & Sherwood, J. A. (2012). Evaluating the continuously reinforced concrete pavement performance models of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2012.688172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free