Comparison of stratospheric air parcel trajectories based on different meteorological analyses

17Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Calculated trajectories have been compared with the 1995 Polar Vortex Balloon Experiment (POVORBEX) and 1997 and 1999 Montgolfier Infra-Red (MIR) long-duration balloon flights in the Arctic stratospheric vortex. The POVORBEX flight lasted 6 days, whereas the MIR flights lasted 13, 22, 7, and 17 days. The trajectories have been run at the pressure of the balloon (10 - 120 hPa), whereby the dominant contribution of the horizontal trajectory errors can be assessed. To obtain statistically significant results, new trajectories were started every 2 hours along the balloon flight track. Trajectories run at a temporal resolution of the meteorological fields of 24 hours sometimes give substantially larger errors than trajectories run at 12 hours or higher resolution owing to rapid nonlinear temporal developments. In 1995 the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) trajectories generally have substantially larger errors than the U.K. Meteorological Office (UKMO) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) trajectories, when 24 hourly analyses are used. In 1997 and 1999, when ECMWF had introduced a variational data assimilation, their trajectory errors inside the vortex have apparently reduced considerably and are generally substantially smaller than UKMO and NCEP errors. Copyright 2001 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knudsen, B. M., Pommereau, J. P., Garnier, A., Nunez-Pinharanda, M., Denis, L., Letrenne, G., … Rosen, J. M. (2001, February 27). Comparison of stratospheric air parcel trajectories based on different meteorological analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free