Heading in Football: insights from stakeholders in amateur football

11Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite emerging research questioning the long-term effect of purposeful heading on players’ brain health, heading-related perspectives and behaviours of stakeholders in amateur football in Australia (a country without heading guidelines) remain unknown. This study aimed to explore the current heading-related perspectives and behaviours of football stakeholders. In total, 290 players (aged over 11 years), 54 coaches, 34 non-coaching staff and 14 medical staff completed the survey. Of the 290 players, 56.5% reported being formally trained in heading, with female players less likely to be trained than male players (p < 0.05). Players were the least concerned about the long-term effects of heading, while medical staff were the most concerned (33.1% and 57.1%, respectively). From proposed strategies to reduce heading burden, a heading ban for all ages was least popular (2.3%), while teaching heading technique was most popular (67.3%). Our study provides insights into football stakeholders’ heading-related perspectives, which could be used, along with scientific evidence, to inform pragmatic future heading guidelines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parsanejad, E., McKay, M. J., Ross, A. G., Pappas, E., & Peek, K. (2024). Heading in Football: insights from stakeholders in amateur football. Science and Medicine in Football, 8(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2023.2224282

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free