Prevalence of Medication Nonadherence to Co-medication Compared to Immunosuppressants in Heart Transplant Recipients: Findings From the International Cross-sectional BRIGHT Study

14Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To assess and compare the prevalence of medication nonadherence (MNA) (implementation and persistence) to immunosuppressants and co-medications in heart transplant recipients. Methods: MNA prevalence was assessed using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (self-report) and compared using logistic regression in a 4-continent sample of 1397 heart transplant recipients from 36 heart transplant centers in 11 countries. Findings: MNA was significantly (α = 0.05) higher to co-medications than to immunosuppressants (taking nonadherence: 23.9% vs 17.3%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.30–1.73; drug holiday: 5.7% vs 1.9%; OR = 3.17; 95% CI, 2.13–4.73; dose alteration: 3.8% vs 1.6%; OR = 2.46; 95% CI, 1.49–4.06; and discontinuation: 2.6% vs 0.5%; OR = 5.15; 95% CI, 2.36–11.20). Implications: The observed MNA necessitates adherence-enhancing interventions encompassing the entire post–heart transplant medication regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01608477.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helmy, R., Scalso de Almeida, S., Denhaerynck, K., Berben, L., Dobbels, F., Russell, C. L., … Maddicks-Law, J. (2019). Prevalence of Medication Nonadherence to Co-medication Compared to Immunosuppressants in Heart Transplant Recipients: Findings From the International Cross-sectional BRIGHT Study. Clinical Therapeutics, 41(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.11.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free