DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL-TWIN FOR BUILDING FACILITIES (PART 3): A COMPARISON OF METAHEURISTICS AND REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR OPTIMAL CONTROLS

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, to quantitatively evaluate a metaheuristic and a model-based reinforcement learning which are control methods using a predictive model, these methods were compared for energy costs and computational loads. As a result, it was revealed that a metaheuristic has more saving energy costs, whereas model-based reinforcement learning has lower computational loads. Therefore, it is necessary to select an appropriate method to a target system, for example, a metaheuristic is more suitable for a mode control, and a model-based reinforcement learning is more suitable for a water flow control of pumps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsuda, Y., & Ooka, R. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL-TWIN FOR BUILDING FACILITIES (PART 3): A COMPARISON OF METAHEURISTICS AND REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR OPTIMAL CONTROLS. Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan), 87(793), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.3130/aije.87.222

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free