Redox and Nonredox CO2Utilization: Dry Reforming of Methane and Catalytic Cyclic Carbonate Formation

92Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

CO2 emissions are too large to tackle with a single process, but a combination of avoidance with chemical utilization may be able to slow global warming. In this Focus Review, we identify two large-scale CO2 conversion processes based on their viability and opposite energy requirements. In the high-energy, stationary path, CO2 reforming of methane could provide gigatons of CO2 utilization through synthesis gas. The main problem is the lack of a durable, effective, low-cost dry reforming catalyst. The exothermic cyclic carbonate formation from CO2 and organic epoxides offers a low-energy, mobile, nonredox route. The catalysts, however, must be metal-free and robust, have a high surface area, and be low-cost while being easily scalable. These two processes could potentially address at least a quarter of all current CO2 emissions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Subramanian, S., Song, Y., Kim, D., & Yavuz, C. T. (2020, May 8). Redox and Nonredox CO2Utilization: Dry Reforming of Methane and Catalytic Cyclic Carbonate Formation. ACS Energy Letters. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free