Comparison of K-means and fuzzy c-means algorithm performance for automated determination of the arterial input function

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The arterial input function (AIF) plays a crucial role in the quantification of cerebral perfusion parameters. The traditional method for AIF detection is based on manual operation, which is time-consuming and subjective. Two automatic methods have been reported that are based on two frequently used clustering algorithms: fuzzy c-means (FCM) and K -means. However, it is still not clear which is better for AIF detection. Hence, we compared the performance of these two clustering methods using both simulated and clinical data. The results demonstrate that K-means analysis can yield more accurate and robust AIF results, although it takes longer to execute than the FCM method. We consider that this longer execution time is trivial relative to the total time required for image manipulation in a PACS setting, and is acceptable if an ideal AIF is obtained. Therefore, the K-means method is preferable to FCM in AIF detection. © 2014 Yin et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yin, J., Sun, H., Yang, J., & Guo, Q. (2014). Comparison of K-means and fuzzy c-means algorithm performance for automated determination of the arterial input function. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free