Upstream versus downstream thrombin inhibition

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: For a long time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the preferred drugs for the anticoagulation management of both atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Hereby, the major purpose is to attenuate the onset of thrombosis without affecting hemostasis. Areas covered: Nowadays, non-vitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC), a new class of oral anticoagulants is available for the above-mentioned indications. NOAC are at least as effective and safer with regard to intracranial bleedings compared to VKA, but major bleedings still occur. For this reason, the search for safer anticoagulants is still ongoing. Expert commentary: There are several unmet needs in NOAC management, including selection of optimal drug and dose, uncertainty on specific conditions and lack of drug persistence. There remains to be an important need for safer anticoagulants; ‘upstream’ anticoagulants including inhibitors of factor XIa may provide additional benefit related to fewer bleeding complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gulpen, A. J. W., Ten Cate-Hoek, A. J., & Ten Cate, H. (2016, November 1). Upstream versus downstream thrombin inhibition. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2016.1224179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free