Significance of chorionicity on long-term outcome of low birthweight infants of <1500g in twin pregnancies

10Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of very low birthweight twins by chorionicity and to identify the perinatal predictors for outcomes in the era of laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Material and Methods This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of twin pregnancy infants <1500g from 2003 through 2010. During the study period, laser surgery was performed on cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. The composite of adverse outcomes at 3years of age was defined, including death, cerebral palsy, and developmental delay. The association between perinatal factors and adverse outcomes was evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 162 infants (79 dichorionic diamniotic twins [DCDA] and 83 monochorionic diamniotic twins [MCDA]) were included in this study. Laser surgery was performed on 11 cases. The rate of adverse outcomes was 13.9% for DCDA and 26.5% for MCDA. The incidence of each outcome for DCDA and MCDA was: cerebral palsy, 1.3% and 4.8%; developmental delay, 8.9% and 9.6%; and death, 3.8% and 14.5%. Gestational age at birth (adjusted odds ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.84); and anemia at birth (adjusted odds ratio, 10.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-66.9) were independent risk factors, whereas chorionicity did not have significance for outcomes. Conclusion The long-term outcome of very low birthweight MCDA was almost identical to that of DCDA. Gestational age and anemia at birth were independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawamura, H., Ishii, K., Yonetani, N., Mabuchi, A., Hayashi, S., & Mitsuda, N. (2015). Significance of chorionicity on long-term outcome of low birthweight infants of <1500g in twin pregnancies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 41(8), 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free