Utilizing Clinical Pharmacist Specialist to Manage Hepatitis C Virus Patients on Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy

14Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of a clinical pharmacist specialist (CPS)-managed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment clinic (HCVTC) in treating HCV-infected veterans with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Methods: We established a CPS-managed HCVTC under a collaborative practice agreement with our infectious disease physician (IDP). A total of 132 veterans were treated between November 1, 2014, and November 30, 2015. The CPS engaged in pretreatment screening, drug selection, patient education, medication counseling, drug therapy monitoring, drug utilization review, addressing issues on drug adherence, and routine and posttreatment follow-up of patients to assess sustained virologic response (SVR) after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: Of 132 patients managed by the CPS, 87 (66%) were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), 29 (22%) with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir + dasabuvir (PrOD), and 16 (12%) with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimen. The corresponding regimens demonstrated a SVR rate of 92% (n = 80), 100% (n = 29), and 93.8% (n = 15), respectively. We achieved an SVR rate of 94% against HCV genotype 1 (GT-1) and 100% against GT-2 to GT-4. The overall SVR rate was 94% across regimens, showing 93% in treatment-naive patients and 96% in treatment-experienced patients, and 93% in noncirrhotic and 94% in compensated cirrhotic patients. The results were comparable to SVR data reported in pivotal trials for DAAs. Conclusion: The results suggest that CPS could be effectively utilized in drug therapy management of HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikolas, L. A., Jacques, K., Huq, M., Krasner, C., & Mambourg, S. E. (2019). Utilizing Clinical Pharmacist Specialist to Manage Hepatitis C Virus Patients on Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 32(6), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190018777345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free