The phenomenon of “obesity paradox” in neck of femur fractures

15Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of body mass index (BMI) with 30 days and 1-year mortality outcomes of orthopedic elderly patients after hip fracture surgery. Methods: This is prospective study conducted at Department of Orthopaedics, at a tertiary care public sector hospital in Karachi between Jan-2016 to Jan-2018. In this short follow-up study, we included the data of 490 patients, who were operated for neck of femur fractures in a public sector tertiary care hospital between Jan-2016 to Jan-2018. Patients were divided into different categories on the basis of BMI; BMI <20 Kg.m-2 underweight, 20-24.99 Kg.m-2 normal weight, BMI 25-29.99 Kg.m-2 overweight, ≥30 obese. Mortality at 30 days and 1-year mortality were primary study end-points. Results: Rate of re-admission within 30 days, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days and 30 days mortality was high in underweight and lowest in obese patients. Thirty-day mortality rate was 2.7% in underweight, 1.3% in normal weight, 0.64% in over-weight and 0.0% in obese patients but this was not significant statistically (p-value 0.29). One-year mortality rate was significantly high in under-weight patients, 34.2%, 25.9% in normal weight, 21.4% in overweight and only 14.5% in obese patients (p-value 0.009). Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio 0.40 (0.26-0.63), and ASA III-IV (odds ratio; 0.27 (0.16-0.45) are also significant risk factors of 1-year mortality Conclusion: BMI classification can serve as an important indicator of adverse early outcomes after hip fracture surgery. Over-weight and obese patients have better survival outcomes and have lower 1-year mortality rate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tahir, M., Ahmed, N., Samejo, M. Q. A., & Jamali, A. R. (2020). The phenomenon of “obesity paradox” in neck of femur fractures. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(5), 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.5.1952

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free