Risk factors for bad outcome in pediatric epidural hematomas: A systemic review

11Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric epidural hematomas (EDH) represent a neurosurgical emergency. Both surgical and conservative treatment can lead to a good clinical outcome. The aim of the study was to review our series of pediatric EDH and to determine the clinical and radiologic factors, which can influence the final outcome. Methods: All children aged from 0 to 16 that have been treated between 2013 and 2017 for cranial EDH have been selected. Results: Thirty children have been included in the study. Seventeen cases have been treated with surgical evacuation and 13 conservatively. Six months after the trauma, the outcome was excellent (mRS 0) in 25/30 (83.3%) cases, mild deficits (mRS 1-2) were present in 4/30 (13.3%), and severe deficits (mRS 3-5) in 1/30 (3.3%) cases. Only a GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) below 8 at admission was significantly related to the presence of a neurologic deficit at 6 months (p = 0.048). Conclusions: EDH can be managed with excellent outcomes. Even in the presence of bad initial clinical and radiologic conditions, a correct treatment strategy can lead to a good recovery. In our series, only a GCS below 8 at admission was significantly related to the presence of neurological sequelae.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spazzapan, P., Krašovec, K., & Velnar, T. (2019, August 8). Risk factors for bad outcome in pediatric epidural hematomas: A systemic review. Chinese Neurosurgical Journal. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-019-0167-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free