Construct validity of a serious game for laparoscopic skills training: Validation study

19Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Surgical residents underutilize opportunities for traditional laparoscopic simulation training. Serious gaming may increase residents' motivation to practice laparoscopic skills. However, little is known about the effectiveness of serious gaming for laparoscopic skills training. Objective: The aim of this study was to establish construct validity for the laparoscopic serious game Underground. Methods: All study participants completed 2 levels of Underground. Performance for 2 novel variables (time and error) was compared between novices (n=65, prior experience <10 laparoscopic procedures), intermediates (n=26, prior experience 10-100 laparoscopic procedures), and experts (n=20, prior experience >100 laparoscopic procedures) using analysis of covariance. We corrected for gender and video game experience. Results: Controlling for gender and video game experience, the effects of prior laparoscopic experience on the time variable differed significantly (F2,106=4.77, P=.01). Both experts and intermediates outperformed novices in terms of task completion speed; experts did not outperform intermediates. A similar trend was seen for the rate of gameplay errors. Both gender (F1,106=14.42, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

IJgosse, W., van Goor, H., Rosman, C., & Luursema, J. M. (2020). Construct validity of a serious game for laparoscopic skills training: Validation study. JMIR Serious Games, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/17222

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free