Umbrella reviews (systematic review of reviews)

57Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With a ‘downpour’ of studies being published there is an increasing need to synthesize existing research to inform policy, practice and research. Umbrella reviews adopt explicit and systematic methods to search for, and identify, multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses to compare and contrast findings of individual reviews, and provide an overall picture of findings for a particular research question. Using research on physical activity and mental health as a test case, we identified and assessed 11 umbrella reviews using recommended criteria from the Cochrane collaboration (Pollock et al., 2020). Our findings suggest that many methodological components of umbrella reviews were done well by the included reviews and are in line with best practice in conducting systematic reviews. Some issues, specific to umbrella review methodology, need further attention in future reviews. These include dealing explicitly with potential primary study overlap, using MeSH terms in search strategies, detailing the data extraction process and presenting all necessary information from primary studies and included systematic reviews. Opening an umbrella with these considerations in mind will help sport and exercise psychology researchers conduct such reviews in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faulkner, G., Fagan, M. J., & Lee, J. (2022). Umbrella reviews (systematic review of reviews). International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1934888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free