The immunohistochemical profile of Spitz nevi and conventional (non-Spitzoid) melanomas: A baseline study

41Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several isolated markers have been proposed to aid in differential diagnostic of difficult melanocytic lesions, albeit none has been shown to be definitive in differentiating Spitz nevus from melanoma. This study proposes a wide panel of 22 markers having important functions in different biological functions (cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair proteins and membranous receptors) to provide a combination of proteins associated with either benign or malignant phenotype. Using tissue microarrays, we compared protein expression profiles in 28 typical Spitz nevi and 62 primary vertical growth phase non-spitzoid melanomas. Most of the significant differences were linked to cell-cycle deregulation such as overexpression of cyclin D1 and p21 in Spitz nevi compared with non-spitzoid melanomas (74 vs 16% and 91 vs 27%, respectively) and mitotic rate including Ki-67, highly expressed in deep areas of non-spitzoid melanomas (37%), whereas it is not expressed in Spitz nevi (0%), topoisomerase IIα (79% in non-spitzoid melanomas vs 15% in Spitz nevi) and nuclear survivin (69% in melanomas vs 0% in Spitz nevi). A combination of biological markers differentially expressed in Spitz nevi from non-spitzoid melanomas is defined, thus providing a potential tool for histopathological differential diagnostic between Spitz nevus and melanoma. Nevertheless, more studies including atypical Spitz nevi and spitzoid melanomas are necessary to further establish a reliable panel to differentiate among difficult cases. © 2010 USCAP, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garrido-Ruiz, M. C., Requena, L., Ortiz, P., Pérez-Gómez, B., Alonso, S. R., & Rodríguez Peralto, J. L. (2010). The immunohistochemical profile of Spitz nevi and conventional (non-Spitzoid) melanomas: A baseline study. Modern Pathology, 23(9), 1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free