Optimum orientation of volume phase gratings in sillenite crystals: is it always [111]?

  • Shamonina E
  • Kamenov V
  • Ringhofer K
  • et al.
26Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study the simultaneous influence of optical activity, piezoelectric effect, and elasto-optic effect on two-wave mixing (TWM) under diffusion recording in photorefractive Bi12TiO20 and Bi12SiO20 crystals and find numerically the maximum of the TWM gain as a function of the orientation of the grating vector. Contrary to widespread belief, the grating orientation K∥[111] is the optimum orientation only if optical activity is negligibly small. Nonzero optical activity results in a strong dependence of the optimum grating orientation on the crystal thickness. The strongest deviation of the optimum from the [111] direction is achieved for ϱd = 180°, where ϱ is the rotatory power and d is the crystal thickness. Our theory explains well prior results for crystals of moderate thickness and predicts new effects for thick (e.g., fiberlike) crystals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shamonina, E., Kamenov, V. P., Ringhofer, K. H., Cedilnik, G., Kiessling, A., & Kowarschik, R. (1998). Optimum orientation of volume phase gratings in sillenite crystals: is it always [111]? Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 15(10), 2552. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.15.002552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free