Response to “Low cost, uncertain value: Why cheap PV may still not become UK's main power source”

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We endorse the ideas presented by the authors Klöckl et al. on the need of a mixed bag of energy supplies, with this likely being a combination of solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear in the future. Nevertheless, based on our analysis, we believe that the increased deployment capacity of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems will decrease their cost more than wind, making solar PV important in meeting the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) requirements for greater sustainability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandys, F., Chitnis, M., & Silva, S. R. P. (2023, May 12). Response to “Low cost, uncertain value: Why cheap PV may still not become UK’s main power source.” Patterns. Cell Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100753

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free