Predictors for long-term outcome and quality of life of patients after cardiac surgery with prolonged intensive care unit stay

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. This study investigated factors determining the long-term outcome and quality of life of patients with a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay after cardiac surgery. Design: A retrospective analysis was performed in 230 patients that had undergone cardiac surgery and suffered from a post-operative ICU stay of 7 or more days at our institution. Among 11 pre-, 13 intra-, and 14 post-operative variables, factors influencing 5-year outcome were identified by logistic regression analysis. Quality of life was determined using the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Results. In-hospital mortality was 12%. One hundred and eleven of 187 patients (59%) were alive after 5 years. Non-survivors were older (70 vs. 65 years, p= 0.005) and had a higher additive EuroSCORE (7 vs. 5, p= 0.034). Logistic regression identified pre-operative atrial fibrillation (AF), (28 vs. 10%, p= 0.003) as the strongest predictor for a 5-year outcome, followed by myocardial infarction (62 vs. 41%, p= 0.005), and prolonged mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 5 days, p= 0.036). Survivors did not show an impaired physical component summary SF-36 score (39 vs. 46, p= 0.737) or mental component summary score (55 vs. 55, p= 0.947) compared to an age-matched German Normative Sample. Conclusions: Pre-operative AF proved to be the most important factor determining the 5-year outcome of patients with a prolonged ICU stay after cardiac surgery. Neither physical nor mental health appeared to be impaired in these patients. © 2012 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grothusen, C., Attmann, T., Friedrich, C., Freitag-Wolf, S., Haake, N., Cremer, J., & Schöttler, J. (2013). Predictors for long-term outcome and quality of life of patients after cardiac surgery with prolonged intensive care unit stay. Interventional Medicine and Applied Science, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.1.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free