Why routine clinical follow-up for patients with early stage endometrial cancer is not always necessary: A study on women in South Wales

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the existing methods of follow-up in women who have undergone treatment of early endometrial carcinoma in South Wales and to assess if they are appropriate. Design: This study used a retrospective analysis of follow-up data. Setting: This study was performed in the Virtual Gynaecological Oncology Centre, South Wales, United Kingdom. Sample: This study sample is composed of 552 women. Methods: Data regarding follow-up were collected retrospectively from patient case notes and computerized data systems. Data were analyzed using the Pearson W2 test, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves. Main Outcome Measures: This study aimed to determine whether routine follow-up was beneficial in detecting disease recurrence and whether outcome was influenced by routine follow-up. Results: Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, 552 women were treated for early stage endometrial carcinoma. The 5-year survivalwas 81%, and the 5-year progressionfree survival was 77%. Of these 552 women, 81 (15%) developed a disease recurrence; the majority (61/81 [75%]) recurred within 3 years. The median survival was 35 months comparedwith 47months in patientswho did not develop a recurrence.Of the 81 patients, 73 (90%) were symptomatic and only 5 patients were truly asymptomatic at follow-up. The most important and significant prognostic factor was "recurrent disease" with overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.20; P G 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.65) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.52; P G 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-2.95). "Asymptomatic recurrence" was not an independent predictor of outcome. Conclusions: Routine follow-up for early endometrial cancer is not beneficial for patients because most were symptomatic at the time of detection. It does not significantly improve the outcome.We propose altering the follow-up time regimen and adopting alternative follow-up strategies for women in South Wales. Copyright © 2014 by IGCS and ESGO.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aung, L., Howells, R. E. J., Lim, K. C. K., Hudson, E., & Jones, P. W. (2014). Why routine clinical follow-up for patients with early stage endometrial cancer is not always necessary: A study on women in South Wales. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 24(3), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free