On the assessment of generative AI in modeling tasks: an experience report with ChatGPT and UML

213Citations
Citations of this article
268Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most experts agree that large language models (LLMs), such as those used by Copilot and ChatGPT, are expected to revolutionize the way in which software is developed. Many papers are currently devoted to analyzing the potential advantages and limitations of these generative AI models for writing code. However, the analysis of the current state of LLMs with respect to software modeling has received little attention. In this paper, we investigate the current capabilities of ChatGPT to perform modeling tasks and to assist modelers, while also trying to identify its main shortcomings. Our findings show that, in contrast to code generation, the performance of the current version of ChatGPT for software modeling is limited, with various syntactic and semantic deficiencies, lack of consistency in responses and scalability issues. We also outline our views on how we perceive the role that LLMs can play in the software modeling discipline in the short term, and how the modeling community can help to improve the current capabilities of ChatGPT and the coming LLMs for software modeling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cámara, J., Troya, J., Burgueño, L., & Vallecillo, A. (2023). On the assessment of generative AI in modeling tasks: an experience report with ChatGPT and UML. Software and Systems Modeling, 22(3), 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01105-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free