8. Sınıf İngilizce Öğretim Programının Bağlam, Girdi, Süreç ve Ürün (CIPP) Modeline Göre Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to evaluate the eighth grade English curriculum of secondary education, which has been carried out since the academic year 2018-2019, in line with the opinions of the teachers by using the context-input-process-product (CIPP) model developed by Stufflebeam. In the study, a case study was applied, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study group of the research consists of 8th grade English teachers working in Gaziantep and Şırnak Provinces, which are determined by using criterion sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling method. Qualitative data were obtained through structured interview forms based on the CIPP Model. Descriptive analysis method was used in analyzing qualitative data. The research group consists of 8th grade English teachers working in Gaziantep and Şırnak. The qualitative data were collected through structured interview forms based on the CIPP Model. In the analysis of qualitative data, descriptive analysis method was used. In order to evaluate the program from various perspectives and to provide a holistic framework, to obtain valuable data it is important to carry out the evaluation study by adapting it to the CIPP Model. Context evaluation results; The teachers stated that the program aims were to improve the language skills and to prepare for the exam. In the program, preparing for the exam is not specified as an aim. Results regarding input evaluation; it was observed that teachers' views especially on materials were negative and for many reasons they were insufficient to meet the objectives of the program. Process evaluation results; In the process, it was observed that some problems such as program intensity, classroom environment, insufficient class hours, level differences between students and bias towards the course were experienced. Results related to product evaluation; The program was found to be insufficient in reaching the intended targets, but it contributed to the vocabulary. The results of the research revealed that the program needed revision in theory.