Maniace Castle in Syracuse, Italy: Comparison Between Present Structural Situation and Hypothetical Original Configuration by Means of Full 3D FE Models

  • Casolo S
  • Milani G
  • Alberto Sanjust C
  • et al.
9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Maniace Castle in Syracuse, Italy, built under Emperor Frederick II in the first half of the 13th century, is analyzed from a structural point of view by means of a detailed 3D Finite Element model. The castle was struck by many catastrophic events during the centuries, which heavily damaged the structure and caused subsequent changes in the origi-nal implant. After a concise description of the main architectural characteristics of the building and its actual state of degradation, two full 3D FE numerical analyses are discussed, representing respectively the present geometric configuration and that ob-tained after a hypothetical intervention aimed at reporting the structure into its original conceived shape. Conventional static analyses in the linear range are performed on such large scale meshes, under gravity loads and horizontal loads con-ventionally representing seismic excitation, respectively investigating the role played by self-weight into the degradation of some structural elements (particularly central columns of the hypostyle hall) and the effect induced by horizontal forces on both the global behavior and the local widespread local regions with positive stresses. On the basis of such numerical results, some useful observations to be considered in a future plan of restoration aimed at reporting the castle in its original configuration are finally provided. © Casolo et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casolo, S., Milani, G., Alberto Sanjust, C., & Taliercio, A. (2012). Maniace Castle in Syracuse, Italy: Comparison Between Present Structural Situation and Hypothetical Original Configuration by Means of Full 3D FE Models. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 6(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501206010173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free