Secret external encodings do not prevent transient fault analysis

93Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contrarily to Kerckhoffs' principle, many applications of today's cryptography still adopt the security by obscurity paradigm. Furthermore, in order to rely on its proven or empirical security, some realizations are based on a given well known and widely used cryptographic algorithm. In particular, a possible design would obfuscate a standard block cipher E by surrounding it with two secret external encodings Pi and P2 (one-to-one mappings), leading to the proprietary algorithm E' = P2 o E o P1. A claimed advantage of this approach is that, since inputs and outputs of the underlying function E are not known by a potential attacker, such a construction is usually believed to inherently prevent any kind of transient fault analysis that may apply on the core function E. In this paper, we show that this latter argument is not true, by exhibiting a key recovery attack which applies to the whole class of externally encoded DES or Triple-DES. Moreover, our attack remains applicable even in the presence of the classical counter-measure against fault attacks which consists in executing the algorithm twice and returning an output only if both results are identical. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clavier, C. (2007). Secret external encodings do not prevent transient fault analysis. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4727 LNCS, pp. 181–194). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free