Practice-based depression case management in primary care: A qualitative study on family doctors' perspectives

13Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Case management provided by health care assistants (HCAs) is effective in improving primary care for depressive patients. Little is known on the implementation-related aspects of case management performed in small family practices. Objective: To explore family doctors' perspectives on clinical and organizational aspects of implementation of case management and perceived practice-related aspects associated with patient care after 1 year's experience of HCAs providing case management for depressive patients in their practices. Methods: This qualitative study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial on case management provided by practice-based HCAs for patients with major depression in Germany. We used semi-structured interview guides and performed audio-taped interviews with family doctors. Full transcription and thematic content analysis were carried out. Results: Twenty-three family doctors were interviewed. The family doctors perceived case management as beneficial to patients and reported that it improved their consultation styles and doctor-patient relationships. They implemented case management elements into their everyday day work using 'concrete', 'subsumed' or 'progressive' implementation styles. Conclusions: Family doctors perceived practice-based case management by HCAs as beneficial for patient care. Different implementation styles may be appropriate, depending on the health care setting, and this requires further evaluation. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gensichen, J., Güthlin, C., Kleppel, V., Jäger, C., Mergenthal, K., Gerlach, F. M., & Petersen, J. J. (2011). Practice-based depression case management in primary care: A qualitative study on family doctors’ perspectives. Family Practice, 28(5), 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free