Abstract
Background. Proteinuria is a predictor of graft loss and death in kidney transplant recipients. This study examines the clinical significance of albumin-to-creatinine (ACR) and protein-to-creatinine (PCR) ratios compared with conventional dipstick measures of proteinuria.Methods. At this single centre, 500 adult patients with a functioning kidney transplant > 4 months provided a urine sample for dipstick, ACR and PCR. The primary end point was defined as death-censored graft loss. Associations between proteinuria and graft loss were examined by concordance statistics and multivariate Cox models.Results. There were 32 graft losses over a mean 2.98 years follow-up. PCR (c = 0.82, P < 0.001) and ACR (c = 0.83, P < 0.001) demonstrated similar concordance with events, and both scored higher than dipstick (c = 0.76, P < 0.001). ACR cut points of 30 and 300 mg/g for grading albuminuria were equivalent to 130 and 490 mg/g for PCR. Moderate grades of proteinuria by ACR and PCR were predicted of adverse events in a multivariate analysis.Conclusions. ACR and PCR are probably equivalent in predicting adverse events. Conventional dipstick is also predictive but does not appear to be as sensitive. © 2010 The Author.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Panek, R., Lawen, T., & Kiberd, B. A. (2011). Screening for proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 26(4), 1385–1387. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq503
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.