Assessment of the efficacy of periodontal tissue regeneration using non-resorbable and bioabsorbable GTR membrane-A clinical comparative study

3Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The present study aims to assess the efficacy of non-resorbable and bioabsorbable guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane periodontal tissue regenerative methods. Materials and methods: Thirty teeth taken from 20 patients (8 males and 12 females) within the age range of 20-55 years having chronic periodontitis were enrolled in this trial. All the enrolled patients underwent phase I therapy which included scaling and root planing performed in two sittings by a single practitioner. Patients who fulfilled the selection criteria entered the study and were randomly allocated to the three groups. Group I: control group, group II: patients who received a non-resorbable GTR membrane, and group III: patients who received a bioabsorbable GTR membrane. The clinical parameters that were documented at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively were the gingival index, plaque index, and probing depth (vertical and horizontal) for all the three groups. Results: The mean gingival index score was 1.64 ± 0.32 in group III at baseline, which decreased to 1.20 ± 0.10 at 6 months postoperatively. The plaque index reduced from 1.36 ± 0.46 at baseline to 1.04 ± 0.01 at 6 months postoperatively. The vertical and horizontal probing depths demonstrated a statistically significant difference between all the three groups. Conclusion: The present study established that both membranes resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in the treatment of grade II furcation defects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jalaluddin, M., Patel, R. K. V., Almalki, S. A., Nagdev, P., Roshan, R., & Varkey, R. R. (2019). Assessment of the efficacy of periodontal tissue regeneration using non-resorbable and bioabsorbable GTR membrane-A clinical comparative study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 20(6), 675–679. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2578

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free