A comparison of analytical goals for haemoglobin A(1c) assays derived using different strategies

68Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Analytical goals for the performance characteristics of assays of haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) have been investigated using different assumptions for generation of estimates, these being based on strategies using data on biological variation and on the clinical use of results. The derived goals are highly dependent on the assumptions made. In general, in monitoring of patients (using results from the same laboratory), the analytical imprecision is the most demanding, whereas bias (inaccuracy) is the most important characteristic when strategies for several centres (laboratories) to achieve similar results are invoked. Goals for analytical quality should be given in a form in which both analytical imprecision and bias (or systematic error) are specified. When several goals are to be considered (for different relevant assumptions), the most demanding should be used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larsen, M. L., Fraser, C. G., & Petersen, P. H. (1991). A comparison of analytical goals for haemoglobin A(1c) assays derived using different strategies. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 28(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329102800313

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free