CLIN-RADIOLOGY

  • Choi Y
  • Gabikian P
  • Zhu F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI (DSC MRI) has utility in differentiating recurrent malignant glioma from treatment-related changes. Preliminary studies suggest that arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion may be equal to DSC MRI for post-treatment tumor evaluation. We tested this hypothesis with a retrospective analysis of malignant gliomas for which ASL and/or DSC MRI were obtained. METHOD(S): Forty-five studies in 40 patients (18 female and 22 male; median age, 52) were re-evaluated by three neuroradiologists (each case was read by 2 neuroradiologists). Only malignant gliomas previously treated with chemoradiation were evaluated. Radiographic correlation was determined using a 3-point scale: 1 = increased perfusion/persistent tumor, 2 = equivocal perfusion/indefinite, and 3 = decreased perfusion/ treatment necrosis. Clinical assessment also used a 3-point scale: 1 = progressive disease, 2 = equivocal/disease progression versus treatment effect, and 3 = treatment effect or no evidence of disease progression. After independent scoring, the radiographic diagnosis was compared to the actual clinical diagnosis established at neuro-oncologic follow-up or by pathologic assessment. Observer concordance, technique concordance, and clinical accuracy were evaluated. RESULT(S): Observer concordance for ASL was complete in 28/45 cases and partial in 17/45 cases. For DSC MRI, observer concordance was complete in 17/28 cases and partial in 11/28 cases. ASL- and DSC MRI-based diagnoses were the same in 19/28 cases and discordant in 9/28 cases. In all but one of the 9 discordant cases, one of the two observers rated either the ASL or DSC MRI as indefinite. Nine patients had a treatment change at the time of imaging. Clinical assessment at follow-up confirmed the imaging assessment in 35/45 cases. Of the 10 discordant cases, 8 of the clinical assessments remained indeterminate for progression versus treatment effect, without change in therapy, at the time of follow-up. CONCLUSION(S): ASL perfusion may be a reliable alternative to DSC MRI for differentiating recurrent/persistent neoplasm from treatment effect. A controlled prospective study is warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, Y. J., Gabikian, P., Zhu, F., Appelbaum, D. E., Wollmann, R. L., Lukas, R. V., … Nelson, S. J. (2012). CLIN-RADIOLOGY. Neuro-Oncology, 14(suppl 6), vi120–vi128. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free