Abstract
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. Due to an inadvertent error caused by calculation of the models, replace: In our climatic conditions, up to 83.9%, 46.9%, and 6.9% of A. sterilis, L. rigidum, and P. rhoeas emergences would have been killed by SD1, while these values would go up to 86.2%, 62.4%, and 17.8%, respectively in SD2, and up to 91.9%, 77.7%, and 42.3% in SD3. with: In our climatic conditions, up to 83.9%, 46.9%, and 32.3% of A. sterilis, L. rigidum, and P. rhoeas emergences would have been killed by SD1, while these values would go up to 86.2%, 62.4%, and 47.3%, respectively in SD2, and up to 91.9%, 77.7%, and 68.1% in SD3. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Royo-Esnal, A., & Valencia-Gredilla, F. (2019, September 1). Correction: Camelina as a rotation crop for weed control in organic farming in a semiarid mediterranean climate. (Agriculture (2018) 8, 10, 156). Agriculture (Switzerland). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090191
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.