Modified Temporal Incision for the Management of Zygomatic Arch fractures—A Retrospective Study for 7 Years

  • Devakumari S
  • Dominic N
  • Vijhayapriya T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Modified temporal incision in the management of zygomatic arch fractures (ZAF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 34 patients who underwent open reduction for zygomatic arch fractures were retrieved and included in the study between 2011 and 2018. These patients were followed up at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks respectively. Clinical parameters such as post-operative infection, hematoma, scarring, degree of mouth opening, palpability of plates, alopecia and weakness of temporal branch of Facial nerve recorded were analyzed for complications of modified temporal incision in the management of ZAF. RESULTS: A thorough analysis of the clinical parameters revealed that at the end of 4 weeks scarring was present in 4 patients and temporal branch of Facial nerve weakness was present in 21 patients. None of the patients had hematoma, infection or palpability of miniplates. At the end of 8 weeks the only complication recorded was weakness of temporal branch of Facial nerve in 21 patients. By 12 weeks, all patients had complete recovery and none of the patient had weakness of temporal branch of Facial nerve. CONCLUSION: The results obtained proved that the Modified temporal incision can be considered as a reliable method in the management of zygomatic arch fractures. The incision can be adopted with confidence in suitable cases of zygomatic arch fractures without any permanent morbidity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devakumari, S., Dominic, N., Vijhayapriya, T., Dinesh, D. S., & Devameena, S. (2022). Modified Temporal Incision for the Management of Zygomatic Arch fractures—A Retrospective Study for 7 Years. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 15(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387521989550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free