How political institutions, history and experience affect government budgeting processes and ways of achieving ‘value for money’

  • Podger A
  • Su T
  • Wanna J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

All governments face the challenge of scarce resources, requiring budgetary management processes for identifying the resources required by and available to government, and then for allocating them and ensuring their use or deployment represents value for money. Such budgetary and financial management processes need to routinely inform decision-making and protect the integrity of the way public resources are used—with some public accountability to indicate that their uses are properly authorised and reflect the policies of legitimate government leaders. The processes ideally should also facilitate assessments of how well the resources have been used, and of whether and how efficiently

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Podger, A., Su, T., Wanna, J., Niu, M., & Chan, H. S. (2018). How political institutions, history and experience affect government budgeting processes and ways of achieving ‘value for money.’ In Value for Money: Budget and financial management reform in the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia (pp. 1–16). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/vm.01.2018.01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free