Abstract
BACKGROUNDThe oncological efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are under debate for the Western population with predominantly advanced gastric cancer undergoing multimodality treatment.METHODSIn 10 experienced upper GI centers in the Netherlands, patients with resectable (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. No masking was performed. The primary outcome was hospital stay. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. It was hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy leads to shorter hospital stay, less postoperative complications, and equal oncological outcomes.RESULTSBetween 2015 and 2018, a total of 227 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 115) or open gastrectomy (n = 112). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 77 patients (67%) in the laparoscopic group and 87 patients (78%) in the open group. Median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-9) in both groups (P =.34). Median blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group (150 v 300 mL, P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Van Der Veen, A., Brenkman, H. J. F., Seesing, M. F. J., Haverkamp, L., Luyer, M. D. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., … Van Hillegersberg, R. (2021). Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39(9), 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01540
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.