Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

202Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe oncological efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are under debate for the Western population with predominantly advanced gastric cancer undergoing multimodality treatment.METHODSIn 10 experienced upper GI centers in the Netherlands, patients with resectable (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. No masking was performed. The primary outcome was hospital stay. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. It was hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy leads to shorter hospital stay, less postoperative complications, and equal oncological outcomes.RESULTSBetween 2015 and 2018, a total of 227 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 115) or open gastrectomy (n = 112). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 77 patients (67%) in the laparoscopic group and 87 patients (78%) in the open group. Median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-9) in both groups (P =.34). Median blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group (150 v 300 mL, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Der Veen, A., Brenkman, H. J. F., Seesing, M. F. J., Haverkamp, L., Luyer, M. D. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., … Van Hillegersberg, R. (2021). Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39(9), 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free