High dose propofol enhances red cell antioxidant capacity during CPB in humans

41Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare low vs high dose propofol and isoflurane on red cell RBC antioxidant capacity in patients during aortocoronary bypass surgery (ACBP). Methods: Twenty-one patients, for ACBP, were anesthetized with sufentanil 0.5-10 μg · kg-1 and isoflurane 0-2%; ISO = control; n=7), or sufentanil 0.3 μg · kg-1, propofol 1-2.5 mg · kg-1 bolus then 100 μg · kg-1 · min-1 before, and 50 μg · kg-1 · min-1 during CPB (LO; n=7), or sufentanil 0.3 μg · kg-1, propofol 2-2.5 mg · kg-1 bolus then 200 μg · kg-1 · min-1 (HI; n=7). Venous blood was drawn pre- and post- induction, after 30 min CPB, 5, 10, and 30 min of reperfusion, and 120 min post-CPB to measure red cell antioxidant capacity (malondialdehyde (MDA) production in response to oxidative challenge with t-butyl hydrogen peroxide) and plasma propofol concentration. Pre- induction blood samples were analyzed for antioxidant effects of nitrates on red cells. The tBHP concentration response curves for RBC MDA in ISO, LO and HI were determined. Results: Preoperative nitrate therapy did not effect RBC MDA production. Perioperative RBC MDA production was similar in ISO and LO groups. Sustained intraoperative decrease in RBC MDA was seen with propofol 8.0 ± 2.4 - I 1.8 ± 4.5 μg.ml-1 in HI (P < 0.05- 0.0001). MDA production vs log plasma propofol concentration was linear in HI dose. Conclusions: During CPB, RBC antioxidant capacity is enhanced and maintained with HI dose propofol. Propofol, at this dose, may prove useful in protecting against cardiopulmonary ischemia- reperfusion injury associated with ACBP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ansley, D. M., Sun, J., Visser, W. A., Dolman, J., Godin, D. V., Garnett, M. E., & Qayumi, A. K. (1999). High dose propofol enhances red cell antioxidant capacity during CPB in humans. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 46(7), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013951

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free