Is WHODAS 2.0 useful for colorectal cancer survivors?

13Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To compare the disability level of colorectal cancer survivors with and without stoma by using the Korean version of the 12-item, interview-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (Korean version of WHODAS 2.0).Methods This is a multicenter (five tertiary university hospitals and the Korea Ostomy Association) and cross-sectional survey. Colorectal cancer survivors with and without stoma were interviewed. Survey measured disability level using the Korean version of WHODAS 2.0 and health-related quality of life using the SF-36.Results A significant difference was observed between patients with and without a stoma in two subdomains: getting around (31.1 vs. 20.3; p=0.013) and participation in society (32.3 vs. 22.2; p=0.028). After adjusting for age, gender, and time since surgery, having a stoma was associated with severe to extreme disabilities in participation (OR=2.72, p=0.045). The Korean version of WHODAS 2.0 showed satisfactory internal consistency (r=0.96) and convergent validity.Conclusion Patients with stoma participated less in society than those without stoma. The Korean version of WHODAS 2.0 is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring disability in Korean colorectal cancer patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. H., Shin, E. K., Shin, H. I., & Yang, E. J. (2017). Is WHODAS 2.0 useful for colorectal cancer survivors? Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(4), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free