Counterpoint: Clinical neuroscience is not ready for clinical use

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Radical proposals are being made to change the practice, teaching and research basis of psychiatry to that of clinical neuroscience. Such changes would affect practice via what is studied, published, recommended as standard treatment and what is decided in medico-legal forums. These proposed changes are very premature and misguided. Here, I refute these proposals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rego, M. D. (2016, April 1). Counterpoint: Clinical neuroscience is not ready for clinical use. British Journal of Psychiatry. Royal College of Psychiatrists. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.170878

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free