Mapping population-level spatial access to essential surgical care in Ghana using availability of bellwether procedures

56Citations
Citations of this article
158Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Conditions that can be treated by surgery comprise more than 16%of the global disease burden. However, 5 billion people do not have access to essential surgical care. An estimated 90% of the 87 million disability-Adjusted life-years incurred by surgical conditions could be averted by providing access to timely and safe surgery in low-income and middle-income countries. Population-level spatial access to essential surgery in Ghana is not known. OBJECTIVES To assess the performance of bellwether procedures (ie, open fracture repair, emergency laparotomy, and cesarean section) as a proxy for performing essential surgery more broadly, to map population-level spatial access to essential surgery, and to identify first-level referral hospitals that would most improve access to essential surgery if strengthened in Ghana. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based study among all households and public and private not-for-profit hospitals in Ghana. Households were represented by georeferenced census data. First-level and second-level referral hospitals managed by the Ministry of Health and all tertiary hospitals were included. Surgical data were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES All procedures performed at first-level referral hospitals in Ghana in 2014 were used to sort each facility into 1 of the following 3 hospital groups: Those without capability to perform all 3 bellwether procedures, those that performed 1 to 11 of each procedure, and those that performed at least 12 of each procedure. Candidates for targeted capability improvement were identified by cost-distance and network analysis. RESULTS Of 155 first-level referral hospitals managed by the Ghana Health Service and the Christian Health Association of Ghana, 123 (79.4%) reported surgical data. Ninety-five (77.2%) did not have the capability in 2014 to perform all 3 bellwether procedures, 24 (19.5%) performed 1 to 11 of each bellwether procedure, and 4 (3.3%) performed at least 12. The essential surgical procedure rate was greater in bellwether procedure-capable first-level referral hospitals than in noncapable hospitals (median, 638; interquartile range, 440-1418 vs 360; interquartile range, 0-896 procedures per 100 000 population; P = .03). Population-level spatial access within 2 hours to a hospital that performed 1 to 11 and at least 12 of each bellwether procedure was 83.2%(uncertainty interval [UI], 82.2%-83.4%) and 71.4%(UI, 64.4%-75.0%), respectively. Five hospitals were identified for targeted capability improvement. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Almost 30% of Ghanaians cannot access essential surgery within 2 hours. Bellwether capability is a useful metric for essential surgery more broadly. Similar strategic planning exercises might be useful for other low-income and middle-income countries aiming to improve access to essential surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewart, B. T., Tansley, G., Gyedu, A., Ofosu, A., Donkor, P., Appiah-Denkyira, E., … Mock, C. (2016). Mapping population-level spatial access to essential surgical care in Ghana using availability of bellwether procedures. JAMA Surgery, 151(8). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1239

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free