Las identidades de la crónica. Hibridez, polisemia y ecos históricos en un género entre la literatura y el periodismo

  • Palau Sampio D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As with all border concepts, the concept of chronicle is not exactly crystal clear, particularly when looking for a definition that generates consensus or that acquires some kind of universality. In this paper, we attempt to define it by making a historical review in order to try and understand its different nuances. A chronicle is a hybrid and polysemic term that is somewhere between literature and journalism. After analyzing the journalistic varieties, we were able to identify three types of productions: first, a modality linked to present times, which is shorter; second, long-winded productions, which are demanding in terms of research and access to sources; and third, a variety of author's texts of a more essayistic nature, which uses the informative element only as a starting point. With this distinction, our goal is to unravel the confusion generated by the journalistic genre, since a chronicle is the first modality in Spain, while in some Latin American countries the different meanings coexist under the same name.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palau Sampio, D. (2017). Las identidades de la crónica. Hibridez, polisemia y ecos históricos en un género entre la literatura y el periodismo. Palabra Clave - Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.1.9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free