Representative bureaucracy and the role of expertise in politics

21Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The vast majority of existing studies on bureaucratic representation focus on bureaucracies’ permanent and internal staff. Yet, the rising sophistication of modern democracies and the technocratization of political life are gradually inducing an increased reliance on external experts to assist in the development and implementation of policy decisions. This trend, we argue, raises the need to extend studies of bureaucratic representation to such external and non-permanent experts in governmental affairs. In this article, we take a first step in this direction using seconded national experts (SNEs) in the European Commission as our empirical laboratory. Our results highlight that Commission SNEs do not appear representative of their constituent population (i.e., the EU-27 population) along a number of socio-demographic dimensions. Moreover, we find that the role perception of “experts” is primarily explained by organizational affiliation, and only secondarily by demographic characteristics (except, of course, education).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trondal, J., Murdoch, Z., & Geys, B. (2015). Representative bureaucracy and the role of expertise in politics. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.65

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free