Observations of sea ice thickness, surface roughness and ice motion in Amundsen Gulf

37Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ice thickness and surface roughness measurements of first-year (FY) sea ice were collected with a fix-mounted helicopter-borne electromagnetic (HEM) -laser system in Amundsen Gulf in April to May 2004. The modal ice thickness values are in good qualitative agreement with different ice types identified in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery and shown on ice charts produced by the Canadian Ice Service. Modal ice thickness values which generally represent level ice thicknesses were about 2.0 m over landfast ice. A large range of modal ice thicknesses was observed in the mobile ice region, with values of about 0.2 m (young ice) in leads (where there was high radar backscatter), 0.6 m (thin FY ice) in the polynya (where there was medium to high backscatter), and about 1.1-1.9 m (thick FY ice) elsewhere. High surface roughnesses are strongly associated with high radar backscatter in SAR imagery, and are observed in areas of large shear. The ratio of the standard deviations of ice draft and averaged roughness in an area of landfast ice is in good agreement with the ratio of the standard deviations of ice draft and ice-equivalent roughness expected from isostasy, with constant level ice and snow thickness. However, the standard deviation of ice-equivalent roughness may be significantly underestimated, due to differences in snow thickness between level and deformed ice, and limitations of the laser processing method. Modal ice (plus snow) thicknesses measured with the HEM system are within the range of historical values measured at Cape Parry. Copyright 2008 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterson, I. K., Prinsenberg, S. J., & Holladay, J. S. (2008). Observations of sea ice thickness, surface roughness and ice motion in Amundsen Gulf. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free