Comparison of droperidol and ondansetron prophylactic effect on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus

  • Brião F
  • Horta M
  • Horta B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Copyright © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prophylactic effect of ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus is controversial, while evidence suggests that droperidol prevents pruritus. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of droperidol and ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus. METHODS: 180 ASA I or II patients scheduled to undergo cesarean sections under subarachnoid anesthesia combined with morphine 0.2mg were randomized to receive, after the child's birth, metoclopramide 10mg (Group I - control), droperidol 2.5mg (Group II) or ondansetron 8mg (Group III). Postoperatively, the patients were assessed for pruritus (absent, mild, moderate or severe) or other side effects by blinded investigators. Patients were also blinded to their group allocation. The tendency to present more severe forms of pruritus was compared between groups. NNT was also determined. RESULTS: Patients assigned to receive droperidol [Proportional odds ratio: 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.23-0.88)] reported less pruritus than those who received metoclopramide. Ondansetron effect was similar to metoclopramide [Proportional odds ratio: 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.49-1.83)] . The NNT for droperidol and ondansetron was 4.0 and 14.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ondansetron does not inhibit subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brião, F. F. da C., Horta, M. L., Horta, B. L., de Barros, G. A. M., Behrensdorf, A. P., Severo, I., … Real, A. (2015). Comparison of droperidol and ondansetron prophylactic effect on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 65(4), 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.11.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free