We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Duncan E. Astle; Anna Moore; Louise Marryat; Essi Viding; Karen L. Mansfield; Mina Fazel; Matthias Pierce; Kathryn M. Abel; Jonathan Green; Ann John; Matthew R. Broome; Rachel Upthegrove; Helen Bould; Helen Minnis; Ruchika Gajwani; Madeleine J. Groom; Chris Hollis; Elizabeth Liddle; Kapil Sayal; Vashti Berry; Stephan Collishaw; Helen Dawes; Samuele Cortese; Mara Violato; Jack Pollard; James H. MacCabe; Sarah Jayne Blakemore; Emily Simonoff; Edward Watkins; Rachel M. Hiller; Ellen Townsend; Cherie Armour; John R. Geddes; Lucy Thompson; Matthias Schwannauer; Dasha Nicholls; Matthew Hotopf; Johnny Downs; Atif Rahman; Aditya Narain Sharma; Tamsin J. Ford

Article

We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

The Lancet Psychiatry

DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

3Citations

19Readers

Get full text

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Astle, D. E., Moore, A., Marryat, L., Viding, E., Mansfield, K. L., Fazel, M., … Ford, T. J. (2023, April 1). We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review. The Lancet Psychiatry. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Cite

Register to see more suggestions