Abstract
Those who wish to defend the role of aesthetic values in science face a dilemma: aesthetic language is either used metaphorically for what are ultimately epistemic features, or it is used literally, but the importance of such values for science is unclear. This article introduces a new account that gets around this problem by considering an overlooked source of aesthetic value in science: the relation between form and content. A fit between the content of a thought experiment and the way in which that content is formulated can have important epistemic payoffs by contributing to scientific understanding.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Murphy, A. (2023). Form and Content: A Defense of Aesthetic Value in Science. Philosophy of Science, 90(3), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.46
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.