1422. Comparative Monte-Carlo Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam vs. Ceftazidime–Avibactam Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

  • Smith A
  • White R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The new β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam (AVI), has recently been combined with ceftazidime (CAZ) as CAZ-AVI. AVI is also in Phase 3 clinical trials combined with aztreonam as ATM-AVI. Both drug combinations have similar in vitro activity against some organisms, but ATM-AVI is more potent against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producing organisms. However, against P. aeruginosa (PA), CAZ-AVI is more potent. Since these compounds have similar pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles, and there is a need for drugs for the treatment of resistant microorganisms, a Monte-Carlo analysis (MCA) was used to assess their potential efficacy against carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Methods. MCA (n = 10,000) was performed for ATM-AVI and CAZ-AVI using PK parameters, CrCl vs. Cl regression, PD targets, and recent MICs from peer-reviewed literature against five carbapenem-resistant (CR) organisms: P. aeruginosa (CR-PA), E. cloacae (CR-EC), K. pneumoniae (CR-KP), Enterobacteriaceae (CR-ENT), and MBL producing Enterobacteriaceae (MBL-ENT). Only MIC studies that directly evaluated both combinations were utilized. Our institution's inpatient CrCl distribution (range: 10-120 mL/minute) was used to assess drug clearance. The ATM-AVI regimen was 1.5 g q6h with a 3 hours infusion and adjusted for renal function) and the CAZ-AVI regimen was 2 g q8h with a 2-hour infusion and adjusted for renal function). PD targets (%fT>MIC) for ATM-AVI were 40 and 60% and for CAZ-AVI were 40 and 70%. Results. Target attainment (TA%) for each regimen and organism was: Conclusion. Both ATM-AVI and CAZ-AVI displayed very high TA% (>95%) for CR-EC, CR-KP, and CR-ENT at both PD targets. However, TA% for MBL-ENT was very low for CAZ-AVI and ≥99% for ATM-AVI. Against CR-PA, CAZ-AVI was had much higher TA% than ATM-AVI (87-93% vs. 43-48%). These differences suggest different roles for each drug combination in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, A., & White, R. (2018). 1422. Comparative Monte-Carlo Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam vs. Ceftazidime–Avibactam Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(suppl_1), S439–S439. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free